<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>codesalot.com &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.codesalot.com/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.codesalot.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts, ponderings and technical solutions, tips and tricks about Unified Communications and Video Conferencing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:48:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Lync 2010 and EWS followup</title>
		<link>http://www.codesalot.com/2011/lync-2010-and-ews-followup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codesalot.com/2011/lync-2010-and-ews-followup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesalot.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a followup to this post. Turns out that Outlook doesn&#8217;t really like autodiscover through SRV records and proceeds to ask the user for authentication when this happens. This is often not a desireable situation. The other option seemed to be to add names for autodiscover.domain.com for each of the SMTP domains to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a followup to <a href="http://www.codesalot.com/2011/lync-2010-and-exchange-web-servicesautoconfigure/">this</a> post.</p>
<p>Turns out that Outlook doesn&#8217;t really like autodiscover through SRV records and proceeds to ask the user for authentication when this happens. This is often not a desireable situation.</p>
<p>The other option seemed to be to add names for autodiscover.domain.com for each of the SMTP domains to the certificate on the CAS. We tried this as well, but in this configuration the Lync client started asking about trust of the server. A bit of searching led me to <a href="http://blogs.technet.com/b/jenstr/archive/2011/02/10/lync-cannot-verify-that-the-server-is-trusted-for-your-sign-in-address.aspx">this</a> post by Jens Trier Rasmussen that explains why.</p>
<p>I was not able to find any place to add trusted servers to Lyncs trusted server list, but for Outlook i could, so the solution was to revert to SRV records, and add this regkey to the machines:</p>
<pre class="brush: plain; title: ; notranslate">

Office 2007:
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\12.0\Outlook\AutoDiscover\RedirectServers

Office 2010:
HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\14.0\Outlook\AutoDiscover\RedirectServers
</pre>
<p>add the CAS server FQDN as the value name of a key with value type REG_SZ and empty value data.</p>
<p>This tells Outlook to always trust this server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codesalot.com/2011/lync-2010-and-ews-followup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Test post</title>
		<link>http://www.codesalot.com/2010/test-post/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codesalot.com/2010/test-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesalot.com/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nothing to see here, move along!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing to see here, move along!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codesalot.com/2010/test-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Problems running OCS2009-DBUpgrade on OCS SE/Server 2008?</title>
		<link>http://www.codesalot.com/2010/problems-running-ocs2009-dbupgrade-on-ocs-seserver-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codesalot.com/2010/problems-running-ocs2009-dbupgrade-on-ocs-seserver-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesalot.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just run the msi in an elevated cmd window. UAC is the problem Thanks to Tonino at proexchange.be! http://www.proexchange.be/blogs/ocs2007r2/archive/2010/03/25/executing-the-ocs2009-dbupgrade-package-fails-on-windows-2008.aspx]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just run the msi in an elevated cmd window. UAC is the problem</p>
<p>Thanks to Tonino at proexchange.be!</p>
<li>http://www.proexchange.be/blogs/ocs2007r2/archive/2010/03/25/executing-the-ocs2009-dbupgrade-package-fails-on-windows-2008.aspx</li>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codesalot.com/2010/problems-running-ocs2009-dbupgrade-on-ocs-seserver-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CCNA!</title>
		<link>http://www.codesalot.com/2009/ccna/</link>
		<comments>http://www.codesalot.com/2009/ccna/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CCNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certifications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.codesalot.com/2009/ccna/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just passed my Cisco Certified Network Associate exam that I&#8217;ve been working on the last couple of weeks! Hooray for me!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just passed my Cisco Certified Network Associate exam that I&#8217;ve been working on the last couple of weeks! Hooray for me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.codesalot.com/2009/ccna/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

